{"id":319,"date":"2005-07-12T10:48:30","date_gmt":"2005-07-12T01:48:30","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2007-07-07T02:22:37","modified_gmt":"2007-07-07T09:22:37","slug":"medias-complices","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lmae.net\/?p=319","title":{"rendered":"M\u00e9dias complices"},"content":{"rendered":"

Les m\u00e9dias, c’est 50% du probl\u00e8me (source: The Telegraph<\/a>):<\/p>\n

BBC edits out the word terrorist<\/b>
\nBy Tom Leonard (Filed: 12\/07\/2005)<\/p>\n

The BBC has re-edited some of its coverage of the London Underground and bus bombings to avoid labelling the perpetrators as \u00ab\u00a0terrorists\u00a0\u00bb, it was disclosed yesterday.<\/p>\n

Early reporting of the attacks on the BBC’s website spoke of terrorists but the same coverage was changed to describe the attackers simply as \u00ab\u00a0bombers\u00a0\u00bb.<\/p>\n

The BBC’s guidelines state that its credibility is undermined by the \u00ab\u00a0careless use of words which carry emotional or value judgments\u00a0\u00bb.<\/p>\n

Consequently, \u00ab\u00a0the word ‘terrorist’ itself can be a barrier rather than an aid to understanding\u00a0\u00bb and its use should be \u00ab\u00a0avoided\u00a0\u00bb, the guidelines say.<\/p>\n

Rod Liddle, a former editor of the Today programme, has accused the BBC of \u00ab\u00a0institutionalised political correctness\u00a0\u00bb in its coverage of British Muslims.<\/p>\n

A BBC spokesman said last night: \u00ab\u00a0The word terrorist is not banned from the BBC.\u00a0\u00bb<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\nLa BBC a donc effac\u00e9 toute mention du mot \u00ab\u00a0terroriste\u00a0\u00bb pour d\u00e9signer les auteurs de la tuerie de jeudi dernier. Il n’y a pas eu d’acte terroriste \u00e0 Londres. Il y a eu une s\u00e9rie d’explosions, par des \u00ab\u00a0artificiers\u00a0\u00bb, pas des terroristes. Le terme terroriste<\/i> implique un \u00ab\u00a0jugement moral\u00a0\u00bb, et a une port\u00e9e \u00ab\u00a0\u00e9motionnelle\u00a0\u00bb. Dixit la d\u00e9p\u00eache ci-dessus, la BBC en conclut donc que le mot terroriste serait nuisible \u00e0 la compr\u00e9hension des \u00e9v\u00e8nements.
\nOn nage en plein d\u00e9lire politiquement correct. Poser des bombes pour tuer des civils dans le but de provoquer la terreur<\/i> \u00e0 des fins politiques s’appelle bien du terrorisme<\/i>. Les terroristes sont \u00e9videmment des \u00eatres inf\u00e2mes qu’il faut traquer puis mettre hors d’\u00e9tat de nuire d\u00e9finitivement (mort ou prison). Ceux qui pr\u00e9tendent le nier se font leurs complices: il faut d\u00e9signer les choses par leur nom. Refuser de le faire implique une n\u00e9gation de la r\u00e9alit\u00e9, de se r\u00e9fugier dans un monde alternatif o\u00f9 plus rien n’a de sens. Un monde de relativisme moral absolu (contradictoire, hein ?) o\u00f9 plus rien n’est condamnable, plus rien n’est mal, o\u00f9 il faut se garder de tout jugement moral.
\nC’est \u00e9videmment un pi\u00e8ge dans lequel il ne faut pas tomber. Pour vouloir survivre il faut aimer la vie, conna\u00eetre ses ennemis, leur id\u00e9ologie, la condamner, et les combattre. Si l’on ne sait m\u00eame plus d\u00e9signer les ennemis (s’il n’y a pas de terroristes, il n’y a pas de terrorisme), si ils n’ont aucun motif propre (car toutes leurs actions sont le r\u00e9sultat des notres), s’il faut s’abstenir de juger leurs actes, pourquoi, comment les combattre ? Ce monde absurde c’est celui que proposent les m\u00e9dias.<\/p>\n

Mise \u00e0 jour: lire aussi (ce qui devrait d\u00e9j\u00e0<\/i> \u00eatre fait) le billet de Ludovic Monnerat: La tentation de la normalit\u00e9<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Les m\u00e9dias, c’est 50% du probl\u00e8me (source: The Telegraph): BBC edits out the word terrorist By Tom Leonard (Filed: 12\/07\/2005) The BBC has re-edited some of its coverage of the London Underground and bus bombings to avoid labelling the perpetrators …<\/p>\n

Lire la suite »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lmae.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/319"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lmae.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lmae.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lmae.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lmae.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=319"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.lmae.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/319\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lmae.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=319"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lmae.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=319"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lmae.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=319"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}